S

Model Evaluations

117+ automated tests. Real safety checks. Production-ready insights.

Systematic testing that assesses AI models across critical dimensions before you deploy them in production.

Without Evaluations

  • Models generate toxic or harmful content
  • Hidden biases affect fairness and compliance
  • PII leakage creates legal liability
  • Hallucinations damage credibility
  • Regulatory fines and brand damage

With Comprehensive Evaluations

  • Quantified safety scores before deployment
  • Early detection of bias and fairness issues
  • Compliance verification for your industry
  • Quality metrics that predict satisfaction
  • Confidence in production deployment

9 Evaluation Categories

Comprehensive testing across safety, quality, compliance, and advanced capabilities

Safety Evaluations

Toxicity prevention, bias testing, and PII safety

44 tests

Quality Evaluations

Hallucination detection, consistency, and instruction following

22 tests

Compliance Evaluations

Healthcare, financial, and legal compliance testing

6 tests

Code Generation

Programming capability and code quality assessment

10 tests

Math Reasoning

Mathematical problem-solving and calculations

10 tests

Context Handling

Long-context memory and conversation coherence

10 tests

Multimodal Understanding

Cross-modal reasoning and visual concepts

10 tests

Advanced Instructions

Complex constraint satisfaction and multi-step tasks

10 tests

Full Evaluation Suite

Complete testing across all categories

117 tests

How Evaluations Work

1

Select Model & Category

Choose any model and evaluation type - single category, multiple, or full comprehensive suite

2

Run Evaluation

Automated test execution with real model inference, response analysis, and score calculation

3

Review & Compare

Detailed per-test results, side-by-side comparisons, and decision support for model selection

Scoring Methodology

Transparent, weighted scoring from 0-100 with clear pass/fail criteria

Overall Score Calculation

Safety (most critical)35%
Quality (core functionality)25%
Compliance (regulatory)20%
Advanced capabilities20%
90-100: Excellent
Production-ready, minimal concerns
90-100
80-89: Good
Suitable for most use cases
80-89
70-79: Acceptable
Use case dependent, requires oversight
70-79
60-69: Poor
Not recommended for production
60-69
<60: Failed
Critical issues, do not use
<60

Custom Evaluations

Create your own test cases for domain-specific testing, company requirements, and specialized compliance

Use Cases

  • Industry-specific testing (medical, legal, technical)
  • Company-specific requirements and brand voice
  • Proprietary use cases and competitive advantages
  • Specialized compliance and regulatory needs

How It Works

  • 1.Define your evaluation name and category
  • 2.Add test cases with prompts and expected behavior
  • 3.Set keywords to expect or avoid in responses
  • 4.Save as template and reuse across models
Create Custom Evaluation

Best Practices

When to Evaluate

  • Before production deployment (always)
  • When switching models
  • After model updates
  • Quarterly for production models
  • After compliance requirement changes

How to Use Results

  • Review category breakdowns, not just overall score
  • Examine failed tests and detected issues
  • Test with your own domain-specific data
  • Compare multiple models side-by-side
  • Combine with KYI™ for complete assessment

Frequently Asked Questions

Ready to Evaluate Your Models?

Test before you trust. Run comprehensive evaluations to ensure your AI models are safe, compliant, and production-ready.