Qwen 2.5 72B vs Gemma 2 9B
Comprehensive comparison of two leading open-source AI models
Qwen 2.5 72B
ProviderAlibaba Cloud
Parameters72B
KYI Score8.9/10
LicenseApache 2.0
Gemma 2 9B
ProviderGoogle
Parameters9B
KYI Score7.9/10
LicenseGemma License
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Qwen 2.5 72B | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba Cloud | |
| Parameters | 72B | 9B |
| KYI Score | 8.9/10 | 7.9/10 |
| Speed | 7/10 | 9/10 |
| Quality | 9/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost Efficiency | 9/10 | 10/10 |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Gemma License |
| Context Length | 128K tokens | 8K tokens |
| Pricing | free | free |
Performance Comparison
SpeedHigher is better
Qwen 2.5 72B7/10
Gemma 2 9B9/10
QualityHigher is better
Qwen 2.5 72B9/10
Gemma 2 9B7/10
Cost EffectivenessHigher is better
Qwen 2.5 72B9/10
Gemma 2 9B10/10
Qwen 2.5 72B Strengths
- ✓Best-in-class Chinese support
- ✓Strong multilingual
- ✓Long context
- ✓Versatile
Qwen 2.5 72B Limitations
- ✗Less known in Western markets
- ✗Documentation primarily in Chinese
Gemma 2 9B Strengths
- ✓Efficient
- ✓Fast
- ✓Good for size
- ✓Google backing
Gemma 2 9B Limitations
- ✗Restrictive license
- ✗Shorter context
- ✗Limited capabilities
Best Use Cases
Qwen 2.5 72B
Multilingual applicationsAsian language tasksCode generationTranslation
Gemma 2 9B
ChatbotsContent generationEdge deploymentGeneral tasks
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Qwen 2.5 72B if you need best-in-class chinese support and prioritize strong multilingual.
Choose Gemma 2 9B if you need efficient and prioritize fast.