LLaMA 3.1 405B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Comprehensive comparison of two leading open-source AI models
LLaMA 3.1 405B
ProviderMeta
Parameters405B
KYI Score9.4/10
LicenseLLaMA 3.1 Community License
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
ProviderAlibaba Cloud
Parameters32B
KYI Score9.2/10
LicenseApache 2.0
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | LLaMA 3.1 405B | Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba Cloud |
| Parameters | 405B | 32B |
| KYI Score | 9.4/10 | 9.2/10 |
| Speed | 6/10 | 8/10 |
| Quality | 10/10 | 9/10 |
| Cost Efficiency | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| License | LLaMA 3.1 Community License | Apache 2.0 |
| Context Length | 128K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Pricing | free | free |
Performance Comparison
SpeedHigher is better
LLaMA 3.1 405B6/10
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B8/10
QualityHigher is better
LLaMA 3.1 405B10/10
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B9/10
Cost EffectivenessHigher is better
LLaMA 3.1 405B9/10
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B9/10
LLaMA 3.1 405B Strengths
- ✓Exceptional reasoning
- ✓Strong coding abilities
- ✓Multilingual
- ✓Long context window
LLaMA 3.1 405B Limitations
- ✗Requires significant compute
- ✗Large model size
- ✗Slower inference
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Strengths
- ✓Exceptional coding abilities
- ✓Fast inference
- ✓Long context
- ✓Multi-language
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Limitations
- ✗Specialized for code only
- ✗Less versatile for general tasks
Best Use Cases
LLaMA 3.1 405B
Complex reasoningCode generationResearchContent creationTranslation
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Code generationCode completionDebuggingCode reviewDocumentation
Which Should You Choose?
Choose LLaMA 3.1 405B if you need exceptional reasoning and prioritize strong coding abilities.
Choose Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B if you need exceptional coding abilities and prioritize fast inference.