LLaMA 3.1 405B vs Gemma 2 9B
Comprehensive comparison of two leading open-source AI models
LLaMA 3.1 405B
ProviderMeta
Parameters405B
KYI Score9.4/10
LicenseLLaMA 3.1 Community License
Gemma 2 9B
ProviderGoogle
Parameters9B
KYI Score7.9/10
LicenseGemma License
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | LLaMA 3.1 405B | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Parameters | 405B | 9B |
| KYI Score | 9.4/10 | 7.9/10 |
| Speed | 6/10 | 9/10 |
| Quality | 10/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost Efficiency | 9/10 | 10/10 |
| License | LLaMA 3.1 Community License | Gemma License |
| Context Length | 128K tokens | 8K tokens |
| Pricing | free | free |
Performance Comparison
SpeedHigher is better
LLaMA 3.1 405B6/10
Gemma 2 9B9/10
QualityHigher is better
LLaMA 3.1 405B10/10
Gemma 2 9B7/10
Cost EffectivenessHigher is better
LLaMA 3.1 405B9/10
Gemma 2 9B10/10
LLaMA 3.1 405B Strengths
- ✓Exceptional reasoning
- ✓Strong coding abilities
- ✓Multilingual
- ✓Long context window
LLaMA 3.1 405B Limitations
- ✗Requires significant compute
- ✗Large model size
- ✗Slower inference
Gemma 2 9B Strengths
- ✓Efficient
- ✓Fast
- ✓Good for size
- ✓Google backing
Gemma 2 9B Limitations
- ✗Restrictive license
- ✗Shorter context
- ✗Limited capabilities
Best Use Cases
LLaMA 3.1 405B
Complex reasoningCode generationResearchContent creationTranslation
Gemma 2 9B
ChatbotsContent generationEdge deploymentGeneral tasks
Which Should You Choose?
Choose LLaMA 3.1 405B if you need exceptional reasoning and prioritize strong coding abilities.
Choose Gemma 2 9B if you need efficient and prioritize fast.