LLaMA 3.1 405B vs DeepSeek Coder V2
Comprehensive comparison of two leading open-source AI models
LLaMA 3.1 405B
ProviderMeta
Parameters405B
KYI Score9.4/10
LicenseLLaMA 3.1 Community License
DeepSeek Coder V2
ProviderDeepSeek
Parameters236B (MoE)
KYI Score9.1/10
LicenseMIT
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | LLaMA 3.1 405B | DeepSeek Coder V2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | DeepSeek |
| Parameters | 405B | 236B (MoE) |
| KYI Score | 9.4/10 | 9.1/10 |
| Speed | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Quality | 10/10 | 9/10 |
| Cost Efficiency | 9/10 | 8/10 |
| License | LLaMA 3.1 Community License | MIT |
| Context Length | 128K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Pricing | free | free |
Performance Comparison
SpeedHigher is better
LLaMA 3.1 405B6/10
DeepSeek Coder V27/10
QualityHigher is better
LLaMA 3.1 405B10/10
DeepSeek Coder V29/10
Cost EffectivenessHigher is better
LLaMA 3.1 405B9/10
DeepSeek Coder V28/10
LLaMA 3.1 405B Strengths
- ✓Exceptional reasoning
- ✓Strong coding abilities
- ✓Multilingual
- ✓Long context window
LLaMA 3.1 405B Limitations
- ✗Requires significant compute
- ✗Large model size
- ✗Slower inference
DeepSeek Coder V2 Strengths
- ✓Exceptional coding
- ✓Massive language support
- ✓MIT license
- ✓Long context
DeepSeek Coder V2 Limitations
- ✗Large model size
- ✗Specialized for code
Best Use Cases
LLaMA 3.1 405B
Complex reasoningCode generationResearchContent creationTranslation
DeepSeek Coder V2
Code generationCode completionDebuggingCode translation
Which Should You Choose?
Choose LLaMA 3.1 405B if you need exceptional reasoning and prioritize strong coding abilities.
Choose DeepSeek Coder V2 if you need exceptional coding and prioritize massive language support.