Gemma 2 27B vs Phi-3 Medium
Comprehensive comparison of two leading open-source AI models
Gemma 2 27B
ProviderGoogle
Parameters27B
KYI Score8.5/10
LicenseGemma License
Phi-3 Medium
ProviderMicrosoft
Parameters14B
KYI Score8.3/10
LicenseMIT
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Gemma 2 27B | Phi-3 Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Parameters | 27B | 14B |
| KYI Score | 8.5/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Speed | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Quality | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost Efficiency | 9/10 | 10/10 |
| License | Gemma License | MIT |
| Context Length | 8K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Pricing | free | free |
Performance Comparison
SpeedHigher is better
Gemma 2 27B8/10
Phi-3 Medium9/10
QualityHigher is better
Gemma 2 27B8/10
Phi-3 Medium7/10
Cost EffectivenessHigher is better
Gemma 2 27B9/10
Phi-3 Medium10/10
Gemma 2 27B Strengths
- ✓Google research backing
- ✓Efficient
- ✓Good safety
- ✓Easy to deploy
Gemma 2 27B Limitations
- ✗Shorter context window
- ✗Restrictive license
- ✗Less versatile
Phi-3 Medium Strengths
- ✓Excellent efficiency
- ✓MIT license
- ✓Long context
- ✓Fast
Phi-3 Medium Limitations
- ✗Lower quality than larger models
- ✗Limited capabilities
Best Use Cases
Gemma 2 27B
ChatbotsContent generationSummarizationQ&A
Phi-3 Medium
Edge deploymentMobile appsChatbotsCode assistance
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Gemma 2 27B if you need google research backing and prioritize efficient.
Choose Phi-3 Medium if you need excellent efficiency and prioritize mit license.