Gemma 2 27B vs Gemma 2 9B
Comprehensive comparison of two leading open-source AI models
Gemma 2 27B
ProviderGoogle
Parameters27B
KYI Score8.5/10
LicenseGemma License
Gemma 2 9B
ProviderGoogle
Parameters9B
KYI Score7.9/10
LicenseGemma License
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Gemma 2 27B | Gemma 2 9B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ||
| Parameters | 27B | 9B |
| KYI Score | 8.5/10 | 7.9/10 |
| Speed | 8/10 | 9/10 |
| Quality | 8/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost Efficiency | 9/10 | 10/10 |
| License | Gemma License | Gemma License |
| Context Length | 8K tokens | 8K tokens |
| Pricing | free | free |
Performance Comparison
SpeedHigher is better
Gemma 2 27B8/10
Gemma 2 9B9/10
QualityHigher is better
Gemma 2 27B8/10
Gemma 2 9B7/10
Cost EffectivenessHigher is better
Gemma 2 27B9/10
Gemma 2 9B10/10
Gemma 2 27B Strengths
- ✓Google research backing
- ✓Efficient
- ✓Good safety
- ✓Easy to deploy
Gemma 2 27B Limitations
- ✗Shorter context window
- ✗Restrictive license
- ✗Less versatile
Gemma 2 9B Strengths
- ✓Efficient
- ✓Fast
- ✓Good for size
- ✓Google backing
Gemma 2 9B Limitations
- ✗Restrictive license
- ✗Shorter context
- ✗Limited capabilities
Best Use Cases
Gemma 2 27B
ChatbotsContent generationSummarizationQ&A
Gemma 2 9B
ChatbotsContent generationEdge deploymentGeneral tasks
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Gemma 2 27B if you need google research backing and prioritize efficient.
Choose Gemma 2 9B if you need efficient and prioritize fast.