FLUX.1 vs SDXL Turbo
Comprehensive comparison of two leading open-source AI models
FLUX.1
ProviderBlack Forest Labs
Parameters12B
KYI Score9.5/10
LicenseApache 2.0 (dev), Proprietary (pro)
SDXL Turbo
ProviderStability AI
Parameters2.6B
KYI Score8.3/10
LicenseStability AI License
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | FLUX.1 | SDXL Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Stability AI |
| Parameters | 12B | 2.6B |
| KYI Score | 9.5/10 | 8.3/10 |
| Speed | 6/10 | 10/10 |
| Quality | 10/10 | 7/10 |
| Cost Efficiency | 7/10 | 10/10 |
| License | Apache 2.0 (dev), Proprietary (pro) | Stability AI License |
| Context Length | N/A | N/A |
| Pricing | freemium | free |
Performance Comparison
SpeedHigher is better
FLUX.16/10
SDXL Turbo10/10
QualityHigher is better
FLUX.110/10
SDXL Turbo7/10
Cost EffectivenessHigher is better
FLUX.17/10
SDXL Turbo10/10
FLUX.1 Strengths
- ✓Best-in-class quality
- ✓Excellent prompt adherence
- ✓Photorealistic
- ✓From SD creators
FLUX.1 Limitations
- ✗Pro version is paid
- ✗High compute requirements
- ✗Newer model
SDXL Turbo Strengths
- ✓Extremely fast
- ✓Real-time capable
- ✓Low latency
- ✓Efficient
SDXL Turbo Limitations
- ✗Lower quality than SDXL
- ✗Restrictive license
- ✗Less control
Best Use Cases
FLUX.1
Professional photographyProduct designMarketingArt creation
SDXL Turbo
Real-time applicationsInteractive toolsFast prototyping
Which Should You Choose?
Choose FLUX.1 if you need best-in-class quality and prioritize excellent prompt adherence.
Choose SDXL Turbo if you need extremely fast and prioritize real-time capable.